The Canon R6 Mark II offers several advantages over the Canon R5, including faster continuous shooting speeds and more affordable pricing. But is Canon R6 Mark II better than R5 though?
However, the Canon R5 boasts higher resolution, superior video capabilities, and greater autofocus points, making it a better choice for those needing the absolute best in image quality and versatility.
Table of Contents
Choosing between the Canon R6 Mark II and the Canon R5 can be a tough decision for photographers and videographers.
Both cameras offer exceptional performance, but they cater to slightly different needs and budgets.
In this detailed comparison, we’ll explore the strengths and weaknesses of each model to help you decide which one is the best fit for your work.
Image Sensor and Resolution
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 24.2 MP full-frame CMOS sensor | 45 MP full-frame CMOS sensor |
The Canon R6 Mark II features a 24.2 MP full-frame CMOS sensor, which provides excellent image quality with good low-light performance. However, the Canon R5, with its 45 MP sensor, offers significantly higher resolution. This can be crucial for commercial work, large prints, and detailed cropping.
A few weeks back I climbed Mt Tobrogargan at dusk with the R5. The ability to crop into the image and still retain incredible detail was invaluable for the final print.
The R6 Mark II, while impressive, just doesn’t offer the same level of detail when it comes to heavy cropping.
Autofocus System
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 1,053 | 5,940 |
AF System | Dual Pixel CMOS AF II | Dual Pixel CMOS AF II |
Both cameras feature the Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system, but the R5’s 5,940 AF points offer more precise and versatile autofocus capabilities. This is especially beneficial for action and wildlife photography. The AI-based subject tracking and eye detection in both models are superb, ensuring sharp focus on moving subjects.
Continuous Shooting Speed
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Continuous Shooting | Up to 40 fps (electronic shutter) | Up to 20 fps (electronic shutter) |
The R6 Mark II excels in continuous shooting speed, offering up to 40 fps with the electronic shutter. This makes it ideal for capturing fast-paced action.
In comparison, the R5 offers up to 20 fps, which is still impressive but not as fast as the R6 Mark II.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Video Resolution | 4K 60fps, 6K ProRes RAW via HDMI | 8K 30fps, 4K 120fps |
Heat Management | Improved for longer recording times | More prone to overheating during extended use |
The Canon R5’s video capabilities are a step above with 8K recording at 30fps and 4K at 120fps. This high resolution and frame rate are excellent for professional videography.
However, the R6 Mark II offers 6K ProRes RAW via HDMI and improved heat management, making it more reliable for extended recording sessions. The R5’s tendency to overheat can be a limitation during long shoots.
Image Stabilization
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
IBIS | 5-axis, up to 8 stops | 5-axis, up to 8 stops |
Both cameras feature 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) with up to 8 stops of correction, providing excellent stabilization for handheld shooting.
This is particularly beneficial in low-light conditions and when using longer lenses.
Crop Factors and Resolution
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Crop Mode | 1.6x crop factor | 1.6x crop factor |
Resolution in Crop Mode | Approx. 10 MP | Approx. 17 MP |
Both cameras offer a 1.6x crop factor, useful for extending the reach of your lenses. However, the higher resolution of the R5 means that even in crop mode, the image retains more detail.
This is particularly useful for wildlife photography, where getting closer without disturbing the subject is key.
While photographing a distant eagle with the R5, the crop mode allowed me to fill the frame without sacrificing detail, something the R6 Mark II’s lower resolution struggles with when heavily cropped.
Design and Ergonomics
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Body Design | Ergonomic with good button placement | Slightly bulkier but robust build |
Weight | Lighter | Heavier |
The Canon R6 Mark II has a well-designed ergonomic body, making it comfortable to use for extended periods. It’s slightly lighter than the R5, which can be advantageous for travel and long shoots. The R5, however, has a more robust build, offering durability that professionals often seek.
Battery Life and Power Options
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Battery Life | Good, but varies with use | Comparable, but power-hungry in high-resolution modes |
Battery Grips | Compatible | Compatible |
Both cameras have decent battery life, but heavy use, especially in high-resolution modes on the R5, can drain the battery faster. Battery grips are available for both models, which help extend shooting times.
Storage and Memory
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Card Slots | Dual SD | CFexpress and SD |
The Canon R6 Mark II comes with dual SD card slots, while the R5 offers one CFexpress slot and one SD slot. The CFexpress cards provide faster write speeds, which can be a lifesaver during intense shoots.
During a wedding ceremony recently, the CFexpress card on my R5 saved me when the celebrant took ages to announce the kiss.
They had alluded that it was about to happen, but it just never seemed to! I was running and gunning for some time with my finger on the shutter, trying to make sure I wasn’t going to miss the perfect moment, the high-speed card allowed me to keep shooting without missing a beat.
In the past, with my old Canon 5D Mark III I would have totally lucked out – with the Canon R6 Mark II – I’m really not sure if I would have got it or not, as the buffer speed is a lot slower.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth |
Remote Control | Supported | Supported |
Both cameras offer robust connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, allowing for easy file transfer and remote control.
Integration with Canon’s software and mobile apps enhances the shooting experience, making it easy to manage and share your work on the go.
Price and Value
Feature | Canon R6 Mark II | Canon R5 |
---|---|---|
Price | $$ | $$$$ |
The Canon R6 Mark II is generally more affordable than the R5, making it a great option for those who need high performance without breaking the bank.
The R5, with its higher resolution and advanced video capabilities, commands a higher price but offers features that justify the cost for professionals needing top-tier performance.
In summary
Whether the Canon R6 Mark II is better than the R5 depends on your specific needs.
The R6 Mark II offers excellent performance at a more affordable price, with faster continuous shooting speeds and improved heat management for video.
The R5, on the other hand, provides higher resolution, superior video capabilities, and more autofocus points, making it ideal for professionals who require the best image quality and versatility.
Personal preference and shooting requirements will ultimately guide your decision.
For sports and action photography, the R6 Mark II’s speed might be the decisive factor.
For high-end commercial work, the R5’s resolution and video capabilities could be more beneficial.
Both cameras are exceptional tools that can meet the demands of serious photographers and videographers.
Remember, the best camera is the one that fits your needs and helps you achieve your creative vision.

Brad is a seasoned photographer whose journey began in 2006 with a 3.1-megapixel digital camera. Over the years, he has specialized in various photography genres—from weddings and portraiture to product and studio photography. Based on the Sunshine Coast of QLD, Brad combines his love for education and photography, sharing his expertise on DSLRAD.com, a platform committed to capturing life’s treasured moments and empowering photography enthusiasts.